Just saw the discuss of Lluís's patch, either
{ 'include': './include/include.json' }
or
include(include-cycle-b.json)
is OK to me, but hope only one way is kepted in the end.
On 03/21/2014 10:01 AM, Benoît Canet wrote:
The new directive in the form { 'include': 'path/to/file.json' } will trigger
the
parsing of path/to/file.json.
The directive will be replaced by the result of the parsing.
This will allow for easy modularisation of qapi JSON descriptions files.
On 03/26/2014 07:49 PM, Wenchao Xia wrote:
Just saw the discuss of Lluís's patch, either
{ 'include': './include/include.json' }
or
include(include-cycle-b.json)
is OK to me, but hope only one way is kepted in the end.
We already had this discussion; we want the { 'include':
The new directive in the form { 'include': 'path/to/file.json' } will trigger
the
parsing of path/to/file.json.
The directive will be replaced by the result of the parsing.
This will allow for easy modularisation of qapi JSON descriptions files.
The qapi commands now takes the input file path
