On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56 AM, jagan 402ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your info, In fact I was thinking about to use
drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 0) for first and drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 1) also.
But the point I was still uncover is even I was using drive_get(IF_PFLASH,
0, 0) on both
I think I understand the situation, like when I called
pflash_cfi01_register, it verifies BlockDriverState is 0.
Was my understanding correct?
If ie so. I think I need to change drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 0) to
drive_get_next(IF_PFLASH) on second flash access by
keeping drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 0
And one more point is when I tried drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 0) and then
drive_get_next(IF_PFLASH) individually on second flash.
I didn't observe any issue on bdrv_attach_dev_nofail, as it seems to be
failed on second case if we re-access the flash.
Code snippet:
--
+
On 07/20/2012 05:30 PM, jagan wrote:
I think I understand the situation, like when I called
pflash_cfi01_register, it verifies BlockDriverState is 0.
Was my understanding correct?
If ie so. I think I need to change drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 0) to
drive_get_next(IF_PFLASH) on second flash
Thanks for your info, In fact I was thinking about to use
drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 0) for first and drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 1) also.
But the point I was still uncover is even I was using drive_get(IF_PFLASH,
0, 0) on both the flashes, If I tested through u-boot
I was able to detect two flashes
On 07/19/2012 01:16 PM, jagan wrote:
Yes, I have used same drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 0) with two flashes.
As these flashes are two different banks with individual bases address,
I used the same.
Was there any block allocation problem with this..will you please elaborate.
I couldn't understand
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:16 PM, jagan 402ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I have used same drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 0) with two flashes.
As these flashes are two different banks with individual bases address, I
used the same.
Was there any block allocation problem with this..will you please
From: Jagan 402ja...@gmail.com
This patch adds support for NOR1 flash (Bank #2) on
vexpress-a9 platform. It is 64MB CFI01 compliant flash.
Tested on stable u-boot version through Linux.
Signed-off-by: Jagan 402ja...@gmail.com
---
hw/vexpress.c | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:03 AM, 402ja...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jagan 402ja...@gmail.com
This patch adds support for NOR1 flash (Bank #2) on
vexpress-a9 platform. It is 64MB CFI01 compliant flash.
Tested on stable u-boot version through Linux.
Signed-off-by: Jagan 402ja...@gmail.com
---
