On 2 March 2012 11:35, Igor Mitsyanko wrote:
> Function name type_class_init() gave us a wrong impression of separation
> of type's "class" and "object" entities initialization. Name type_initialize()
> is more appropriate for type_class_init() function (considering what
> operations
> it perform
Function name type_class_init() gave us a wrong impression of separation
of type's "class" and "object" entities initialization. Name type_initialize()
is more appropriate for type_class_init() function (considering what operations
it performs).
Signed-off-by: Igor Mitsyanko
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bo
