On 9/17/18 9:30 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> From: Paolo Bonzini
>
> Now that cpu->interrupt_request is accessed with atomics,
> we can drop the BQL around cpu_reset_interrupt, which is a
> step towards not taking the BQL mandatorily in cpu_exec_interrupt.
>
> Cc: Peter Crosthwaite
> Cc:
From: Paolo Bonzini
Now that cpu->interrupt_request is accessed with atomics,
we can drop the BQL around cpu_reset_interrupt, which is a
step towards not taking the BQL mandatorily in cpu_exec_interrupt.
Cc: Peter Crosthwaite
Cc: Richard Henderson
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
Signed-off-by:
