Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com writes:
This makes the code more readable, making each condition that makes a
field be skipped much more visible, and reduces one level of indentation
in the code.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
---
savevm.c | 156
Il 14/10/2013 18:45, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
+if (field-field_exists !field-field_exists(opaque, version_id))
{
+continue;
+}
+if (field-version_id version_id) {
+continue;
+}
What Markus observed...
I think the change is fine
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:01:12AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com writes:
This makes the code more readable, making each condition that makes a
field be skipped much more visible, and reduces one level of indentation
in the code.
Signed-off-by:
This makes the code more readable, making each condition that makes a
field be skipped much more visible, and reduces one level of indentation
in the code.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
---
savevm.c | 156 ---
1
