Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 35/35] exec: push BQL down to cpu->cpu_exec_interrupt

2018-09-18 Thread David Hildenbrand
> return false; > diff --git a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c > index 931c0103c8..f2a93abf01 100644 > --- a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c > +++ b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c > @@ -480,10 +480,13 @@ bool s390_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int > interrupt_request) >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 35/35] exec: push BQL down to cpu->cpu_exec_interrupt

2018-09-17 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:31:03PM -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > From: Paolo Bonzini > > Most interrupt requests do not need to take the BQL, and in fact > most architectures do not need it at all. Push the BQL acquisition > down to target code. > > Cc: Aleksandar Markovic > Cc: Alexander

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 35/35] exec: push BQL down to cpu->cpu_exec_interrupt

2018-09-17 Thread Emilio G. Cota
From: Paolo Bonzini Most interrupt requests do not need to take the BQL, and in fact most architectures do not need it at all. Push the BQL acquisition down to target code. Cc: Aleksandar Markovic Cc: Alexander Graf Cc: Anthony Green Cc: Artyom Tarasenko Cc: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Christian