Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 10 August 2012 17:04, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This lets us provide a default implementation of a symbol which targets can
override.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
I'm sure you'll be thrilled to hear
On 10 August 2012 17:04, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This lets us provide a default implementation of a symbol which targets can
override.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
I'm sure you'll be thrilled to hear that this doesn't seem to break MacOS
builds :-)
--
This lets us provide a default implementation of a symbol which targets can
override.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
---
compiler.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compiler.h b/compiler.h
index 736e770..f76921e 100644
--- a/compiler.h
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com writes:
Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
If someone comes along and actively maintains support for another
compiler, we can revisit. But otherwise, there's no practical
On 27 July 2012 16:31, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
My approach to this is to avoid non-standard things
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations
So unless you plan on compiling QEMU with xlc, pgi, or icc, I don't
think
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
If someone comes along and actively maintains support for another
compiler, we can revisit. But
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com writes:
Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
If someone comes along and actively maintains support
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 27 July 2012 16:31, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
My approach to this is to avoid non-standard things
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations
This lets us provide a default implementation of a symbol which targets can
override.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
---
compiler.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compiler.h b/compiler.h
index 736e770..f76921e 100644
--- a/compiler.h
On 27 July 2012 14:37, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
--- a/compiler.h
+++ b/compiler.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
# define GCC_ATTR __attribute__((__unused__, format(gnu_printf, 1, 2)))
# define GCC_FMT_ATTR(n, m) __attribute__((format(gnu_printf, n, m)))
# endif
+#define GCC_WEAK
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 27 July 2012 14:37, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
--- a/compiler.h
+++ b/compiler.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
# define GCC_ATTR __attribute__((__unused__, format(gnu_printf, 1, 2)))
# define GCC_FMT_ATTR(n, m)
On 27 July 2012 15:27, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
The GCC manual says Weak symbols are supported for ELF targets,
and also for a.out targets when using the GNU assembler and linker.
Have you tested this on Windows and MacOSX ?
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 27 July 2012 15:27, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
The GCC manual says Weak symbols are supported for ELF targets,
and also for a.out targets when using the GNU assembler and linker.
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 27 July 2012 14:37, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
--- a/compiler.h
+++ b/compiler.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
# define GCC_ATTR __attribute__((__unused__, format(gnu_printf, 1, 2)))
# define GCC_FMT_ATTR(n, m)
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 27 July 2012 15:27, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
The GCC manual says Weak symbols are supported for ELF
Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 27 July 2012 15:27, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
The GCC manual
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 27 July 2012 15:27, Anthony Liguori
Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
If someone comes along and actively maintains support for another
compiler, we can revisit. But otherwise, there's no practical reason to
avoid extensions.
Because it's more
18 matches
Mail list logo
