On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:56:07AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Hmm. We already do proper read-modify-write cycles for actual data
> > transfers, so killing the buffer inside SD sounds like the better
> > idea. qemu_blockalign really should be used only for block-layer internal
> > allocat
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Device models should be able to use it without an unclean include of
>> block_int.h.
>
> Hmm. We already do proper read-modify-write cycles for actual data
> transfers, so killing the buffer inside
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Device models should be able to use it without an unclean include of
>> block_int.h.
>
> Hmm. We already do proper read-modify-write cycles for actual data
> transfers, so killing the buffer inside
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Device models should be able to use it without an unclean include of
> block_int.h.
Hmm. We already do proper read-modify-write cycles for actual data
transfers, so killing the buffer inside SD sounds like the better
idea. qemu
Device models should be able to use it without an unclean include of
block_int.h.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster
---
block.h |2 ++
block_int.h |2 --
hw/sd.c |1 -
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block.h b/block.h
index b6eaaba..8f52abb 10064
