On 10 March 2015 at 16:54, Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:57:27PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 17:08, Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Actually, I should point out that this isn't just a cleanup, but
also a fix. See below.
The
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:03:48PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 10 March 2015 at 16:54, Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:57:27PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 17:08, Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Actually, I should point out
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:57:27PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 17:08, Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
Now that we have get_S1prot, we can apply it to get_phys_addr_v6
for a minor code cleanup.
I
On 12 February 2015 at 17:08, Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
Now that we have get_S1prot, we can apply it to get_phys_addr_v6
for a minor code cleanup.
I think this is a bad idea -- better to keep the long
and short
Now that we have get_S1prot, we can apply it to get_phys_addr_v6
for a minor code cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
target-arm/helper.c | 27 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
Now that we have get_S1prot, we can apply it to get_phys_addr_v6
for a minor code cleanup.
Actually, I should point out that this isn't just a cleanup, but
also a fix. See below.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
