This command attempts to map to the behavior of -cpu ?. Unfortunately, the
output of this command differs wildly across targets.
To accomodate this, we use a weak symbol to implement a default version of the
command that fails with a QERR_NOT_SUPPORTED error code. Targets can then
override and
On 27 July 2012 14:37, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This command attempts to map to the behavior of -cpu ?. Unfortunately, the
output of this command differs wildly across targets.
I've never really understood why so much of the cpu selection
logic is deferred to target-*...
To
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 27 July 2012 14:37, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This command attempts to map to the behavior of -cpu ?. Unfortunately, the
output of this command differs wildly across targets.
I've never really understood why so much of the
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:37:17 -0500
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This command attempts to map to the behavior of -cpu ?. Unfortunately, the
output of this command differs wildly across targets.
To accomodate this, we use a weak symbol to implement a default version of the
On 07/27/2012 07:37 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This command attempts to map to the behavior of -cpu ?. Unfortunately, the
output of this command differs wildly across targets.
To accomodate this, we use a weak symbol to implement a default version of the
s/accomodate/accommodate/
command
