For a fifo read pattern, we only have one running aio (possible other cases that
has less number than num_children in the future), so we need to check if
.acb is NULL against bdrv_aio_cancel() to avoid segfault.
Cc: Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
Cc: Benoit Canet ben...@irqsave.net
Cc: Kevin Wolf
The Monday 01 Sep 2014 à 15:43:11 (+0800), Liu Yuan wrote :
For a fifo read pattern, we only have one running aio
(possible other cases that has less number than num_children in the future)
I have trouble understanding this part of the commit message could you try
to clarify it ?
, so we need
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 10:35:27AM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
The Monday 01 Sep 2014 à 15:43:11 (+0800), Liu Yuan wrote :
For a fifo read pattern, we only have one running aio
(possible other cases that has less number than num_children in the future)
I have trouble understanding this part
The Monday 01 Sep 2014 à 17:26:09 (+0800), Liu Yuan wrote :
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 10:35:27AM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
The Monday 01 Sep 2014 à 15:43:11 (+0800), Liu Yuan wrote :
For a fifo read pattern, we only have one running aio
(possible other cases that has less number than
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:32:04AM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
The Monday 01 Sep 2014 à 17:26:09 (+0800), Liu Yuan wrote :
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 10:35:27AM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
The Monday 01 Sep 2014 à 15:43:11 (+0800), Liu Yuan wrote :
For a fifo read pattern, we only have one
