On Mi, 2014-01-08 at 09:35 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Now the advice given was to have virtio-vga wrap virtio-gpu-base but
from what I can see
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Now the advice given was to have virtio-vga wrap virtio-gpu-base but
from what I can see it really can't. Since it needs to act and look
like a
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This is a virtio-vga device built on top of the virtio-gpu device.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
---
Makefile | 2 +-
default-configs/x86_64-softmmu.mak | 1 +
hw/display/Makefile.objs | 1 +
Hi,
Now the advice given was to have virtio-vga wrap virtio-gpu-base but
from what I can see it really can't. Since it needs to act and look
like a PCI device
Oops, yes. VirtIOPCIProxy wasn't on my radar. That makes things a bit
more messy. Can you just push what you have now somewhere?
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Now the advice given was to have virtio-vga wrap virtio-gpu-base but
from what I can see it really can't. Since it needs to act and look
like a PCI device
Oops, yes. VirtIOPCIProxy wasn't on my radar. That makes
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Do, 2013-11-21 at 13:12 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mi, 2013-11-20 at 15:52 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
On Do, 2013-11-21 at 13:12 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mi, 2013-11-20 at 15:52 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This is a virtio-vga device built on top of the virtio-gpu device.
On Mi, 2013-11-20 at 15:52 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This is a virtio-vga device built on top of the virtio-gpu device.
Ah, I see what you use the wrapping for. Hmm. I think you should use a
common base class instead, i.e. something like virtio-gpu-base
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mi, 2013-11-20 at 15:52 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This is a virtio-vga device built on top of the virtio-gpu device.
Ah, I see what you use the wrapping for. Hmm. I think you
Il 21/11/2013 04:12, Dave Airlie ha scritto:
I'm not sure what that buys me here, I need the virtio-vga to attach
the vga ops the first console that the virtio-gpu registers, it can't
be a separate console, and since virtio-gpu initialises before
virtio-vga I can't tell it to not register the
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This is a virtio-vga device built on top of the virtio-gpu device.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
---
Makefile | 2 +-
default-configs/x86_64-softmmu.mak | 1 +
hw/display/Makefile.objs | 1 +
11 matches
Mail list logo
