On 14.06.2011, at 23:49, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 13.06.2011 um 15:31 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>
>> On 13.06.2011, at 12:13, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>
>>> +/* Memory forced */
>>> +ctx->raddr = ((sr & 0xF) << 28) | (eaddr & 0x0FFF);
>>
>> This is exactly the same as
Am 13.06.2011 um 15:31 schrieb Alexander Graf:
On 13.06.2011, at 12:13, Andreas Färber wrote:
+/* Memory forced */
+ctx->raddr = ((sr & 0xF) << 28) | (eaddr & 0x0FFF);
This is exactly the same as ctx->raddr = eaddr, no?
No, not that I see. The manual is explicit
On 13.06.2011, at 12:13, Andreas Färber wrote:
> From: Hervé Poussineau
>
> In that case, we want to access memory space instead of I/O controller
> interface address space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau
>
> Simplify by avoiding reindentation of existing code.
>
> Cc: Alexander Graf
From: Hervé Poussineau
In that case, we want to access memory space instead of I/O controller
interface address space.
Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau
Simplify by avoiding reindentation of existing code.
Cc: Alexander Graf
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
---
Hello Alex,
This patch fixes a
