On Wed, 09/28 01:54, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> What do you mean about the realpath? Can we use it to set the environment
> variable?
Basically just guess where QTEST_QEMU_BINARY is based on argv[0].
Fam
> -Original Message-
> From: Fam Zheng [mailto:f...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:45 AM
> To: Gonglei (Arei)
> Cc: Daniel P. Berrange; pbonz...@redhat.com; John Snow;
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wubin (H)
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] t
On Wed, 09/28 01:31, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> # ./tests/virtio-net-test
> **
> ERROR:tests/libqtest.c:561:qtest_get_arch: assertion failed: (qemu != NULL)
> Aborted (core dumped)
>
> # ./tests/virtio-blk-test
> **
> ERROR:tests/libqtest.c:561:qtest_get_arch: assertion failed: (qemu != NULL)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 6:15 PM
> To: Fam Zheng
> Cc: Gonglei (Arei); pbonz...@redhat.com; John Snow; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest
On Tue, 09/27 11:17, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Too bad that this seems to be too big a hammer that breaks the way gcov was
> > used: 1) the "rm *.gcda" command now runs in each test, so it's harder to
> > get an overall coverage report; 2) there is a risk that the parallism may
> > corrupt
..@nongnu.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Fam Zheng
> > > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 3:58 PM
> > > To: John Snow
> > > Cc: pbonz...@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel
> > >
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 03:58:07PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 09/21 14:24, John Snow wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/12/2016 05:19 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > Previously all test cases in a category, such as check-qtest-y, are
> > > executed in a single long gtester command. This patch separates
> -Original Message-
> From: Fam Zheng [mailto:f...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 5:59 PM
> To: Gonglei (Arei)
> Cc: John Snow; pbonz...@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel
>
; > To: John Snow
> > Cc: pbonz...@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel
> >
> > On Wed, 09/21 14:24, John Snow wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 08/12/2016 05:19 AM, Fam Zheng
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel
>
> On Wed, 09/21 14:24, John Snow wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/12/2016 05:19 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > Previously all test cases in a category, such as check-qtest-y, are
> > > executed in a single l
On Wed, 09/21 14:24, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/2016 05:19 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Previously all test cases in a category, such as check-qtest-y, are
> > executed in a single long gtester command. This patch separates each
> > test into its own make target to allow better parallism.
> >
On 08/12/2016 05:19 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Previously all test cases in a category, such as check-qtest-y, are
executed in a single long gtester command. This patch separates each
test into its own make target to allow better parallism.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
This saves
Previously all test cases in a category, such as check-qtest-y, are
executed in a single long gtester command. This patch separates each
test into its own make target to allow better parallism.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
This saves 50% of the time "make check takes" compared
13 matches
Mail list logo