No, I can't. I did not build any peripherals. I expect other people to join
for this task.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017, 6:59 PM Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/04/2017 08:34 PM, Michael Rolnik wrote:
> > Hi Richard.
> >
> > Thank you for finding a bug.
> > As for the testing
> > 1. I
On 07/04/2017 08:34 PM, Michael Rolnik wrote:
Hi Richard.
Thank you for finding a bug.
As for the testing
1. I have a small program that calculates fibonacci numbers. I use it to test
mainly stack operations for different CPU flavors (1, 2 or 3 bytes PC).
2. I manually verified that I can
Hi Richard.
Thank you for finding a bug.
As for the testing
1. I have a small program that calculates fibonacci numbers. I use it to
test mainly stack operations for different CPU flavors (1, 2 or 3 bytes PC).
2. I manually verified that I can debug with gdb, that includes
a. stepping
b.
On 06/21/2017 09:15 PM, Michael Rolnik wrote:
Hi all,
are there any action items for me?
What kind of testing are you doing for this?
I just briefly browsed through the code again and happened to see that ROR has
a critical typo. Considering that ROR must be used for multi-byte shifts, I'm
Anyone can explain what is the blocking problem for this target to be pulled
upstream?
I apologize for bothering but I don't have the workflow clear in my mind.
thanks,
Anichang
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v19 00/13] QEMU AVR 8 bit cores
> Local Time: June 22,
Hi all,
are there any action items for me?
Regards,
Michael
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Michael Rolnik wrote:
> This series of patches adds 8bit AVR cores to QEMU.
> All instruction, except BREAK/DES/SPM/SPMX, are implemented. Not fully
> tested yet.
> However I was
This series of patches adds 8bit AVR cores to QEMU.
All instruction, except BREAK/DES/SPM/SPMX, are implemented. Not fully tested
yet.
However I was able to execute simple code with functions. e.g fibonacci
calculation.
This series of patches include a non real, sample board.
No fuses support