On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 18:42 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 26.05.2014 14:48, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:40:54PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
V1 - V2:
- Rebased on qom-next queue.
- Patch 1/4:
- Since there are a lot of discussions on the correct
V1 - V2:
- Rebased on qom-next queue.
- Patch 1/4:
- Since there are a lot of discussions on the correct
way to do the fix, added a FIXME comment to find a better way.
- Patch 2/4:
- Addressed Michael Roth's comments:
- Added output visitor test
- Tweaked it as advised
-
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:40:54PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
V1 - V2:
- Rebased on qom-next queue.
- Patch 1/4:
- Since there are a lot of discussions on the correct
way to do the fix, added a FIXME comment to find a better way.
- Patch 2/4:
- Addressed Michael Roth's
Am 26.05.2014 14:48, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:40:54PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
V1 - V2:
- Rebased on qom-next queue.
- Patch 1/4:
- Since there are a lot of discussions on the correct
way to do the fix, added a FIXME comment to find a better
Quoting Andreas Färber (2014-05-26 11:42:45)
Am 26.05.2014 14:48, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:40:54PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
V1 - V2:
- Rebased on qom-next queue.
- Patch 1/4:
- Since there are a lot of discussions on the correct
way to do