On 17 May 2013 12:50, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Do we have this on a topic branch in ARM SoC now? I
> need a baseline to send a pull request for my cleanup of the
> Integrator PCI
The good news here is QEMU only models the Integrator/CP,
which has no PCI, so all you need to test is real hardware :-)
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> FWIW, I plan to really get this done in the kernel for 3.11 properly
> and rework the entire versatile and realview code base to work without
> any platform specific code in arch/arm.
Sweet!
> The plan is to use the new
> infrastructure f
On 16 May 2013 17:58, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> FWIW, I plan to really get this done in the kernel for 3.11 properly
> and rework the entire versatile and realview code base to work without
> any platform specific code in arch/arm. The plan is to use the new
> infrastructure for PCI and put that code
On Wednesday 15 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>
> > The reworking of the versatile PCI controller model so that it actually
> > behaved like hardware included an attempt to autodetect whether the
> > guest Linux kernel was assuming the o
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The reworking of the versatile PCI controller model so that it actually
> behaved like hardware included an attempt to autodetect whether the
> guest Linux kernel was assuming the old broken behaviour. Unfortunately
> it turns out that there
The reworking of the versatile PCI controller model so that it actually
behaved like hardware included an attempt to autodetect whether the
guest Linux kernel was assuming the old broken behaviour. Unfortunately
it turns out that there are several different variant broken kernels
which behave sligh
