On 12/20/2016 06:34 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:00:35 +0200
Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 12/06/2016 01:32 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
since static and dynamic parts of memory MHPD device are now
in the same table (DSDT), there is no point keeping
them
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:00:35 +0200
Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 12/06/2016 01:32 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > since static and dynamic parts of memory MHPD device are now
> > in the same table (DSDT), there is no point keeping
> > them scattered across the table, so
On 12/06/2016 01:32 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
since static and dynamic parts of memory MHPD device are now
in the same table (DSDT), there is no point keeping
them scattered across the table, so consolidate it
in one place.
There aren't any functional change, only AML text movement
from
since static and dynamic parts of memory MHPD device are now
in the same table (DSDT), there is no point keeping
them scattered across the table, so consolidate it
in one place.
There aren't any functional change, only AML text movement
from externally refferenced MHPD scope directly into
MHPD