On 11/14/18 3:05 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
file-posix.c was taking a 64-bit bytes in raw_co_copy_range_to(),
passing it through a 32-bit parameter of paio_submit_co_full(),
then widening it back to size_t when assigning into acb->aio_nbytes.
Looking at io.c, I can't quickly tell if
file-posix.c was taking a 64-bit bytes in raw_co_copy_range_to(),
passing it through a 32-bit parameter of paio_submit_co_full(),
then widening it back to size_t when assigning into acb->aio_nbytes.
Looking at io.c, I can't quickly tell if bdrv_co_copy_range_internal()
is fragmenting things to
