On 1/7/19 18:33, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:16 AM Li Zhijian wrote:
On 12/22/18 00:12, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:32:11AM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
Don't expect read(2) can always read as many as it's told.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:16 AM Li Zhijian wrote:
>
>
> On 12/22/18 00:12, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:32:11AM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
> >> Don't expect read(2) can always read as many as it's told.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian
> >> Reviewed-by: Richard
On 12/22/18 00:12, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:32:11AM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
Don't expect read(2) can always read as many as it's told.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
This is more a theoretical bugfix than a refactoring right?
Yes，
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:32:11AM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
> Don't expect read(2) can always read as many as it's told.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
This is more a theoretical bugfix than a refactoring right?
> ---
> V4: add reviewed-by tag
> ---
>
Don't expect read(2) can always read as many as it's told.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
---
V4: add reviewed-by tag
---
hw/core/loader.c | 11 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
index
