On 2011-05-31 03:25, BrillyWu wrote:
Hi, Jan
patch which has
been checked. It can be compiled without any error and work
normally.
The patch v3 is here now.
The above text can't be used as a commit log, so this needs to be
fixed.
Moreover, your patch still contains at least on
Hi, Jan
I am sure I have checked it with the scripts/checkpatch.pl, and it
shows no error or warning. Maybe I should check whether my windows
editor and mail client can work well before sending it to
you. I 'm
sorry.
Sorry, you are right. Your patch revealed a bug in the checkpatch
On 2011-05-31 09:39, BrillyWu wrote:
Hi, Jan
I am sure I have checked it with the scripts/checkpatch.pl, and it
shows no error or warning. Maybe I should check whether my windows
editor and mail client can work well before sending it to
you. I 'm
sorry.
Sorry, you are right. Your patch
Blue, this does not trigger the missing braces warning:
Do you mean the bug is that it can not trigger missing
braces warining?
The script fails to detect missing braces as marked below.
It seems that there is no missing braces in my patch, but some
unnecessary braces.
There are no
From: BrillyWu brill...@viatech.com.cn
Hi, Jan
I'm very sorry for these bugs in the patch. Now I have made a
new patch based on the
newest uq/master where the patch has been applied to fix these bugs,
is it feasible? If it is
not acceptable, should I re-generate a patch based on previous
On 2011-05-30 09:40, BrillyWu wrote:
From: BrillyWu brill...@viatech.com.cn
Hi, Jan
I'm very sorry for these bugs in the patch. Now I have made a
new patch based on the
newest uq/master where the patch has been applied to fix these bugs,
is it feasible? If it is
not acceptable,
From brill...@viatech.com.cn
Hi, Jan
Thank you for you review and guide.
I have fixed the bugs and re-generated a clean patch which has
been checked. It can be compiled
without any error and work normally.
The patch v3 is here now.
Signed-off-by:
On 2011-05-30 10:59, BrillyWu wrote:
From brill...@viatech.com.cn
Hi, Jan
Thank you for you review and guide.
I have fixed the bugs and re-generated a clean patch which has
been checked. It can be compiled
without any error and work normally.
The patch v3 is here
Hi, Jan
patch which has
been checked. It can be compiled without any error and work
normally.
The patch v3 is here now.
The above text can't be used as a commit log, so this needs to be
fixed.
Moreover, your patch still contains at least on style issues
scripts/checkpatch.pl
Hi, Jan
@@ -855,6 +870,8 @@ int cpu_x86_register (CPUX86State *env,
env-cpuid_xlevel = def-xlevel;
env-cpuid_kvm_features = def-kvm_features;
env-cpuid_svm_features = def-svm_features;
+env-cpuid_ext4_features = def-ext4_features;
+env-cpuid_xlevel2 =
On 2011-05-10 10:02, BrillyWu wrote:
From: BrillyWu brill...@viatech.com.cn
When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the
feautures of VIA CPU will be passed into kvm guest by calling
the CPUID instruction for Centaur.
Signed-off-by: BrillyWubrill...@viatech.com.cn
On 2011-05-10 10:02, BrillyWu wrote:
From: BrillyWu brill...@viatech.com.cn
When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the
feautures of VIA CPU will be passed into kvm guest by calling
the CPUID instruction for Centaur.
Signed-off-by: BrillyWubrill...@viatech.com.cn
On 05/10/2011 11:02 AM, BrillyWu wrote:
From: BrillyWubrill...@viatech.com.cn
When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the
feautures of VIA CPU will be passed into kvm guest by calling
the CPUID instruction for Centaur.
Applied, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many
From: BrillyWu brill...@viatech.com.cn
When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the
feautures of VIA CPU will be passed into kvm guest by calling
the CPUID instruction for Centaur.
Signed-off-by: BrillyWubrill...@viatech.com.cn
Signed-off-by: KaryJinkary...@viatech.com.cn
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
