device more for standard SD host controller interface (SDHCI).
Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com
---
Makefile.target |1 +
hw/sdhci.c | 748 +++
2 files changed, 749 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On 2 April 2012 07:24, Peter A. G. Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com wrote:
device more for standard SD host controller interface (SDHCI).
Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com
So how does this compare with Vincent Palatin's version?
Am 02.04.2012 09:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 2 April 2012 07:24, Peter A. G. Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com wrote:
device more for standard SD host controller interface (SDHCI).
Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com
So how does this compare
On 04/02/2012 12:00 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 02.04.2012 09:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 2 April 2012 07:24, Peter A. G. Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com wrote:
device more for standard SD host controller interface (SDHCI).
Signed-off-by: Peter A. G.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 2 April 2012 07:24, Peter A. G. Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com wrote:
device more for standard SD host controller interface (SDHCI).
Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Igor Mitsyanko i.mitsya...@samsung.com wrote:
On 04/02/2012 12:00 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 02.04.2012 09:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 2 April 2012 07:24, Peter A. G. Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com wrote:
device more for standard SD host
On 04/02/2012 03:05 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Igor Mitsyankoi.mitsya...@samsung.com wrote:
On 04/02/2012 12:00 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 02.04.2012 09:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 2 April 2012 07:24, Peter A. G. Crosthwaite
On 2 April 2012 09:38, Igor Mitsyanko i.mitsya...@samsung.com wrote:
It looks like this sdhc implements version 1 of standard SDHC specification,
while ours implements second version. Second version should be backwards
compatible with first, I didn't want to submit it yet to see if vmstate
Yes, I've been trying to get my sdhc accepted since last year :) I tried to
comply with specification entirely, your implementation is obviously much
smaller but enough for use with Linux driver (i've tested it with exynos
board emulation).
Does it work, can you add exynos support for SDHCI
On 04/02/2012 05:46 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 April 2012 09:38, Igor Mitsyankoi.mitsya...@samsung.com wrote:
It looks like this sdhc implements version 1 of standard SDHC specification,
while ours implements second version. Second version should be backwards
compatible with first, I
On 04/02/2012 05:47 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Yes, I've been trying to get my sdhc accepted since last year :) I tried to
comply with specification entirely, your implementation is obviously much
smaller but enough for use with Linux driver (i've tested it with exynos
board emulation).
11 matches
Mail list logo
