On Thu, 04/27 11:05, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 27.04.2017 um 03:32 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > On Wed, 04/26 16:49, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 26.04.2017 um 05:34 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> > >
> > > I'll do the actual review of the test case later, but I alread
Am 27.04.2017 um 03:32 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> On Wed, 04/26 16:49, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 26.04.2017 um 05:34 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> >
> > I'll do the actual review of the test case later, but I already have a
> > question... Can we find a way to accep
On Wed, 04/26 16:49, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 26.04.2017 um 05:34 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
>
> I'll do the actual review of the test case later, but I already have a
> question... Can we find a way to accept the expected lock losses on
> systems without OFD? I'm using
Am 26.04.2017 um 05:34 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
I'll do the actual review of the test case later, but I already have a
question... Can we find a way to accept the expected lock losses on
systems without OFD? I'm using RHEL 7 as my main development OS, so I
wouldn't li
On Wed, 04/26 11:34, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> ---
> tests/qemu-iotests/153 | 220 +
> tests/qemu-iotests/153.out | 390
> +
> tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 611 insertions(+)
> c
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
tests/qemu-iotests/153 | 220 +
tests/qemu-iotests/153.out | 390 +
tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 611 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/153
create mode 1
