On Mi, 2014-02-19 at 15:40 -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:59:34AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
However, when I compare unmodified SMBIOS against what I get when
supplying the patched binary table via command line, I get this:
As Laszlo already
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:27:27PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Mi, 2014-02-19 at 15:40 -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
So I gave up on that relatively quickly, as there's no easy and
convenient way to harvest a binary of just one table type from
a host that works the way I want it... :(
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:38:04AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:27:27PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Mi, 2014-02-19 at 15:40 -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
So I gave up on that relatively quickly, as there's no easy and
convenient way to harvest a binary of
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:38:04AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:27:27PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Mi, 2014-02-19 at 15:40 -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
So I gave up on that relatively
On 02/20/14 16:38, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:27:27PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Mi, 2014-02-19 at 15:40 -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
So I gave up on that relatively quickly, as there's no easy and
convenient way to harvest a binary of just one table type from
a
Hi,
In my opinion, generating the entire smbios table in QEMU and using
the romfile_loader mechanism (see seabios src/fw/romfile_loader.c)
would be the preferred solution. I understand that this is more than
you signed up for.
Yes, this is where we should end up long-term. For the time
Hi,
However, when I compare unmodified SMBIOS against what I get when
supplying the patched binary table via command line, I get this:
As Laszlo already sayed: one table per file.
If seabios finds a table provided by qemu it used it, otherwise it
(possibly) generates its own. So we
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:59:34AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
However, when I compare unmodified SMBIOS against what I get when
supplying the patched binary table via command line, I get this:
As Laszlo already sayed: one table per file.
So I gave up on that relatively quickly,
On 02/19/14 21:40, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:59:34AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
However, when I compare unmodified SMBIOS against what I get when
supplying the patched binary table via command line, I get this:
As Laszlo already sayed: one table per file.
On Mo, 2014-02-17 at 15:33 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:09:48AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:37:58PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 06/02/2014 14:38, Gabriel L. Somlo ha scritto:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:02:25PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:21:33AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Unfortunately, if we change the smbios in SeaBIOS, it will show up on
all machine types that use the new version of SeaBIOS. We've had
issues with this type of change before as various OSes react
differently to the change.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:17:29PM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
Sending a patch against QEMU would have definitely been my first
choice, by a wide margin :) But after studying the hw/i386/smbios.c
source file in QEMU for a while, I walked away with the impression
that all it really tries to
On 02/18/14 20:17, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:21:33AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Using Fedora 20 live, I collected the SMBIOS table from the guest
using dmidecode --dump-bin, with the unpatched SeaBIOS
(dmidecode_pc.bin), SeaBIOS with my patch applied
On 02/18/14 22:08, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/18/14 20:17, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:21:33AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Using Fedora 20 live, I collected the SMBIOS table from the guest
using dmidecode --dump-bin, with the unpatched SeaBIOS
(dmidecode_pc.bin),
Add v2.3 fields to Type 17 (Memory Device) structure.
Add Type 2 (Baseboard) structure.
About This Mac on OS X guests will crash and restart the GUI if
Type 17 structures are not compliant with at least v2.3 of the
SMBIOS/DMI spec.
OS X 10.7 and 10.8 will panic during boot if a Type 2
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:09:48AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:37:58PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 06/02/2014 14:38, Gabriel L. Somlo ha scritto:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:02:25PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Thanks. In general, though, it is preferred to
16 matches
Mail list logo
