On 04/20/2010 02:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Not much traffic on this thread ;-)
Indeed ;)
I can see the usefulness of an init_late() to generalize post device
setup issues.
I assume then that you didn't have any other issues with my patch,
other than general code structure
Hi,
Not much traffic on this thread ;-)
Indeed ;)
I can see the usefulness of an init_late() to generalize post device setup
issues.
I assume then that you didn't have any other issues with my patch, other than
general code structure concerns?
Yes, that is the major one. I think it
On 4/14/2010 at 01:24 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
When specifying ide devices using -device, the cmos information
which the bios depends on is not written. This patch generalizes
the cmos hd data setting for the existing code path and adds the
ability to call that
Hi,
When specifying ide devices using -device, the cmos information
which the bios depends on is not written. This patch generalizes
the cmos hd data setting for the existing code path and adds the
ability to call that code on a per machine, per ide drive basis.
Hmm.
With -device and thus
When specifying ide devices using -device, the cmos information
which the bios depends on is not written. This patch generalizes
the cmos hd data setting for the existing code path and adds the
ability to call that code on a per machine, per ide drive basis.
This is important for older
