On Mi, 2016-02-10 at 17:17 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The "max" value is being compared with >=, but addr + width points to
> the first byte that will _not_ be copied. Laszlo suggested using a
> "greater than" comparison, instead of subtracting one like it is
> already done above for the
The "max" value is being compared with >=, but addr + width points to
the first byte that will _not_ be copied. Laszlo suggested using a
"greater than" comparison, instead of subtracting one like it is
already done above for the height, so that max remains always positive.
The mistake is
On 02/10/16 17:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The "max" value is being compared with >=, but addr + width points to
> the first byte that will _not_ be copied. Laszlo suggested using a
> "greater than" comparison, instead of subtracting one like it is
> already done above for the height, so that max
