Difference with AMD PCscsi is that DC-390 contains a EEPROM,
and that a romfile is available to add INT13 support.
This has been successfully tested on:
- MS DOS 6.22 (using DC390 ASPI driver)
- MS Windows 98 SE (using DC390 driver)
- MS Windows NT 3.1 (using DC390 driver)
- MS Windows NT 4.0
Il 02/08/2012 10:37, Hervé Poussineau ha scritto:
Difference with AMD PCscsi is that DC-390 contains a EEPROM,
and that a romfile is available to add INT13 support.
This has been successfully tested on:
- MS DOS 6.22 (using DC390 ASPI driver)
- MS Windows 98 SE (using DC390 driver)
- MS
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
Il 02/08/2012 10:37, Hervé Poussineau ha scritto:
Difference with AMD PCscsi is that DC-390 contains a EEPROM,
and that a romfile is available to add INT13 support.
This has been successfully tested on:
- MS DOS 6.22 (using DC390 ASPI driver)
- MS Windows 98 SE (using
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
Il 02/08/2012 10:37, Hervé Poussineau ha scritto:
Difference with AMD PCscsi is that DC-390 contains a EEPROM,
and that a romfile is available to add INT13 support.
This has been successfully tested on:
- MS DOS 6.22 (using DC390 ASPI driver)
- MS Windows 98 SE (using
Il 02/08/2012 17:09, Hervé Poussineau ha scritto:
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
Il 02/08/2012 10:37, Hervé Poussineau ha scritto:
Difference with AMD PCscsi is that DC-390 contains a EEPROM,
and that a romfile is available to add INT13 support.
This has been successfully tested on:
- MS DOS 6.22
Il 02/08/2012 17:12, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
I can take this patch in the SCSI tree, but... do we really need two
models, considering that the PCI id is the same and that (for the
coolness factor of installing NT 3.1 onto an empty VM) we can just add
ESP support to SeaBIOS? Does the
