On 07/09/2016 23:27, Eric Blake wrote:
> When qemu uses iscsi devices in sg mode, iscsilun->block_size
> is left at 0. Prior to commits cf081fca and similar, when
> block limits were tracked in sectors, this did not matter:
> various block limits were just left at 0. But when we started
>
Hello Eric, Kevin, Paolo,
Thank you very much for the very fast help.
All works fine now!!!
Best regards and have nice weekend
Holger
Am 08.09.2016 um 19:34 schrieb Holger Schranz:
Hi Eric,
Am 08.09.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Eric Blake:
On 09/08/2016 09:27 AM, Holger Schranz wrote:
Hi Eric,
Hi Eric,
Am 08.09.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Eric Blake:
On 09/08/2016 09:27 AM, Holger Schranz wrote:
Hi Eric,
Thanks a lot, it seems the patch works. The VM starting.
Should I take that as a Tested-by: line?
The test was:
1) login as root
2) cd to workdir
3) start virt-viewer: "virt-viewer
On 08/09/2016 17:25, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 09:27 AM, Holger Schranz wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> Thanks a lot, it seems the patch works. The VM starting.
>
> Should I take that as a Tested-by: line?
>
>> Unfortunately we run into the next issue. By the accessing the
>> megasas
Hi Eric,
Thanks a lot, it seems the patch works. The VM starting.
Unfortunately we run into the next issue. By the accessing the
megasas controller we got a SIGSEGV.
See the trave below.
Best regards
Holger
===
Thread 4
On 09/08/2016 05:25 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/08/2016 09:27 AM, Holger Schranz wrote:
Hi Eric,
Thanks a lot, it seems the patch works. The VM starting.
Should I take that as a Tested-by: line?
Unfortunately we run into the next issue. By the accessing the
megasas controller we got a
On 09/08/2016 09:27 AM, Holger Schranz wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks a lot, it seems the patch works. The VM starting.
Should I take that as a Tested-by: line?
> Unfortunately we run into the next issue. By the accessing the
> megasas controller we got a SIGSEGV.
Seems unrelated, let's figure
When qemu uses iscsi devices in sg mode, iscsilun->block_size
is left at 0. Prior to commits cf081fca and similar, when
block limits were tracked in sectors, this did not matter:
various block limits were just left at 0. But when we started
scaling by block size, this caused SIGFPE.
Then, in a
