-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: improve
target_to_host_sock_type conversion
On 1 April 2013 16:49, Petar Jovanovic petar.jovano...@rt-rk.com wrote:
From: Petar Jovanovic petar.jovano...@imgtec.com
Previous implementation has failed to take into account different value of
SOCK_NONBLOCK on target
On 1 April 2013 16:49, Petar Jovanovic petar.jovano...@rt-rk.com wrote:
From: Petar Jovanovic petar.jovano...@imgtec.com
Previous implementation has failed to take into account different value of
SOCK_NONBLOCK on target and host, and existence of SOCK_CLOEXEC.
The same conversion has to be
...@gmail.com;
riku.voi...@linaro.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; r...@twiddle.net; Alexander
Graf
Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: improve
target_to_host_sock_type conversion
My assumption was that if new socket values are added in future, they will
likely be the same for all
: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: improve
target_to_host_sock_type conversion
Hi,
On 27 May 2013 13:49, Petar Jovanovic petar.jovano...@imgtec.com wrote:
Can anyone take a look at this and commit it if there are no other change
requests?
I thought Aurelian had an issue with this patch
...@gmail.com; r...@twiddle.net;
Alexander Graf; Andreas Färber
Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: improve
target_to_host_sock_type conversion
ping
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/232770/
From: Petar Jovanovic
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 3:20
...@linaro.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; r...@twiddle.net; Alexander Graf
Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: improve
target_to_host_sock_type conversion
My assumption was that if new socket values are added in future, they will
likely be the same for all platforms, so they can
; Alexander Graf
Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: improve
target_to_host_sock_type conversion
My assumption was that if new socket values are added in future, they will
likely be the same for all platforms, so they can be supported without
adding new lines of code. Here we convert
ping
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/232770/
From: Petar Jovanovic
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 2:15 AM
To: Aurelien Jarno; Petar Jovanovic
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; riku.voi...@linaro.org; r...@twiddle.net;
blauwir...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH
Am 23.04.2013 02:15, schrieb Petar Jovanovic:
Thanks Aurelien for your comments.
What others think? Can we submit this version of the patch? Riku? Richard,
Blue?
No objection but isn't that a frequent issue that mappings may need to
be extended from time to time? The way I've seen that
] linux-user: improve
target_to_host_sock_type conversion
Am 23.04.2013 02:15, schrieb Petar Jovanovic:
Thanks Aurelien for your comments.
What others think? Can we submit this version of the patch? Riku? Richard,
Blue?
No objection but isn't that a frequent issue that mappings may need
Thanks Aurelien for your comments.
What others think? Can we submit this version of the patch? Riku? Richard, Blue?
Petar
From: Aurelien Jarno [aurel...@aurel32.net]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:47 PM
To: Petar Jovanovic
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Petar
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 05:49:39PM +0200, Petar Jovanovic wrote:
From: Petar Jovanovic petar.jovano...@imgtec.com
Previous implementation has failed to take into account different value of
SOCK_NONBLOCK on target and host, and existence of SOCK_CLOEXEC.
The same conversion has to be applied
ping
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/232770/
From: Petar Jovanovic [petar.jovano...@rt-rk.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 5:49 PM
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Petar Jovanovic; riku.voi...@linaro.org; aurel...@aurel32.net;
r...@twiddle.net;
13 matches
Mail list logo
