On 03/19/2018 04:15 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> We have confused the number of instructions that have been
> executed in the TB with the number of instructions needed
> to repeat the I/O instruction.
>
> We have used cpu_restore_state_from_tb, which means that
> the guest pc is pointing to the
On 03/19/2018 11:54 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/03/2018 04:15, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> We have confused the number of instructions that have been
>> executed in the TB with the number of instructions needed
>> to repeat the I/O instruction.
>>
>> We have used cpu_restore_state_from_tb, whi
On 19/03/2018 04:15, Richard Henderson wrote:
> We have confused the number of instructions that have been
> executed in the TB with the number of instructions needed
> to repeat the I/O instruction.
>
> We have used cpu_restore_state_from_tb, which means that
> the guest pc is pointing to the I/O
> From: Richard Henderson [mailto:richard.hender...@linaro.org]
> We have confused the number of instructions that have been
> executed in the TB with the number of instructions needed
> to repeat the I/O instruction.
>
> We have used cpu_restore_state_from_tb, which means that
> the guest pc is p
We have confused the number of instructions that have been
executed in the TB with the number of instructions needed
to repeat the I/O instruction.
We have used cpu_restore_state_from_tb, which means that
the guest pc is pointing to the I/O instruction. The only
time the answer to the later quest