On 4 April 2016 at 20:26, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Ed Maste writes:
>
>> On 4 April 2016 at 10:35, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> Only the first patch has actually changed. Instead of moving the read
>>> inside the write seqlock it is now
Ed Maste writes:
> On 4 April 2016 at 10:35, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Only the first patch has actually changed. Instead of moving the read
>> inside the write seqlock it is now done using the seqlock_read_*
>> primitives.
>>
>> Build tested on a
On 4 April 2016 at 10:35, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Only the first patch has actually changed. Instead of moving the read
> inside the write seqlock it is now done using the seqlock_read_*
> primitives.
>
> Build tested on a FreeBSB/i386 VM with these applied:
>
>
On 04/04/2016 16:56, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 April 2016 at 15:44, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 04/04/2016 16:35, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> Only the first patch has actually changed. Instead of moving the read
>>> inside the write seqlock it is now done using the
On 4 April 2016 at 15:44, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 16:35, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Only the first patch has actually changed. Instead of moving the read
>> inside the write seqlock it is now done using the seqlock_read_*
>> primitives.
>>
>> Build tested on a
On 04/04/2016 16:35, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Only the first patch has actually changed. Instead of moving the read
> inside the write seqlock it is now done using the seqlock_read_*
> primitives.
>
> Build tested on a FreeBSB/i386 VM with these applied:
>
>
Only the first patch has actually changed. Instead of moving the read
inside the write seqlock it is now done using the seqlock_read_*
primitives.
Build tested on a FreeBSB/i386 VM with these applied:
https://github.com/berrange/qemu/tree/freebsd-fixes
There are still a ton of unrelated