On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()?
Since hd_geometry_guess contains semantics of
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
4. Please use scripts/checkpatch.pl to check coding style.
I did :)
You are right, checkpatch.pl doesn't
Ekaterina Tumanova tuman...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()?
Since hd_geometry_guess contains semantics of x86-specific LBA
translation, we have to modify it not to get in the way of z
On 11/28/2014 01:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()?
Since
Ekaterina Tumanova tuman...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
On 11/28/2014 01:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
3. Why
On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time.
So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to
this thread.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time.
So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to
this thread.
This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize
Am 19.11.2014 um 11:17 schrieb Ekaterina Tumanova:
Hi folks,
I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time.
So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to
this thread.
This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize patch, which was
Hi folks,
I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time.
So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to
this thread.
This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize patch, which was
recently discussed here:
Am 19.11.2014 um 11:17 schrieb Ekaterina Tumanova:
Hi folks,
I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time.
So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to
this thread.
This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize patch, which was
10 matches
Mail list logo