Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-28 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: 3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()? Since hd_geometry_guess contains semantics of

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-28 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: 4. Please use scripts/checkpatch.pl to check coding style. I did :) You are right, checkpatch.pl doesn't

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-28 Thread Markus Armbruster
Ekaterina Tumanova tuman...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes: On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: [...] 3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()? Since hd_geometry_guess contains semantics of x86-specific LBA translation, we have to modify it not to get in the way of z

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-28 Thread Ekaterina Tumanova
On 11/28/2014 01:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: 3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()? Since

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-28 Thread Markus Armbruster
Ekaterina Tumanova tuman...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes: On 11/28/2014 01:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: 3. Why

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-26 Thread Ekaterina Tumanova
On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: Hi folks, I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to this thread.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-25 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: Hi folks, I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to this thread. This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-21 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Am 19.11.2014 um 11:17 schrieb Ekaterina Tumanova: Hi folks, I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to this thread. This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize patch, which was

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-19 Thread Ekaterina Tumanova
Hi folks, I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to this thread. This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize patch, which was recently discussed here:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

2014-11-19 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Am 19.11.2014 um 11:17 schrieb Ekaterina Tumanova: Hi folks, I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to this thread. This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize patch, which was