Would this make sense for -stable? Impact is modest: fix a rather
obscure feature of x86 targets on bigendian hosts, and improve error
messages around it). On the other hand, the patches look pretty safe to
me.
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Better error messages, a bit of code
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Better error messages, a bit of code cleanup, and a big endian fix.
Not addressed: qemu_uuid_parse() sets an SMBIOS field by side effect.
Gross!
Testing:
* Verify error messages improve for
-smbios gaga
-smbios file=gaga
-smbios type=42
-smbios type=1,uuid=gaga
-smbios
On 06/07/13 15:00, Markus Armbruster wrote:
v2: Address Hawkeye Laszlo's review
You're too kind, but it did crack me up :)
(Next time I'll miss something I'll have to hang my head in shame all
the more!)
* 1-3/7 unchanged
* Drop 4/7 because it's buggy, and the fixed version isn't worthwhile
