On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.auwrote:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
The headers say they are BSD licensed... but they include a GPLv2+
header. Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?
It makes perfect sense: you're overthinking it. It just means that
copying the BSD
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
The headers say they are BSD licensed... but they include a GPLv2+
header. Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?
It makes perfect
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
The headers say they are BSD licensed... but they include a GPLv2+
header. Doesn't make
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:14:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Well specifically if_ether.h says GPLv2+ so it's OK for QEMU.
Do you mean for some other non GPL app?
Ignore QEMU for the moment.
The headers say they are BSD licensed... but they include a GPLv2+
header.
Above is a bit
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
The headers say they are BSD licensed... but they include a GPLv2+
header. Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?
It makes perfect sense: you're overthinking it. It just means that
copying the BSD headers outside Linux is encouraged.
And it's
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually
On 26 May 2013 19:10, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
Ouch. Forgot to git-add them. Thanks.
I'll send a fixed version -
could you please try this patch on top?
With this extra patch MacOSX compiles.
thanks
-- PMM
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 07:55:25PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:49:53PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 07:55:25PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:49:53PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02,
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually asm-generic/).
Not really, __uX appear in the headers that were posted.
Which is a
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually asm-generic/).
Not really, __uX appear in the
virtio linux headers are actually pretty portable:
all we need is implement linux/types.h in a portable
way, and we can import them and use on any platform.
These patches do exactly that, as a pre-requisite
to adding support for new virtio layout.
Note: if someone adds non-portable code in files
On 26 May 2013 16:22, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
virtio linux headers are actually pretty portable:
all we need is implement linux/types.h in a portable
way, and we can import them and use on any platform.
These patches do exactly that, as a pre-requisite
to adding support for
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 26 May 2013 16:22, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
virtio linux headers are actually pretty portable:
all we need is implement linux/types.h in a portable
way, and we can import them and use on any platform.
On 26 May 2013 18:51, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
This series breaks compilation on MacOSX:
CCnet/eth.o
In file included from net/eth.c:18:
In file included from /Users/pm215/src/qemu/include/net/eth.h:29:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 07:00:58PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 26 May 2013 18:51, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
This series breaks compilation on MacOSX:
CCnet/eth.o
In file included from net/eth.c:18:
Il 26/05/2013 20:10, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 07:00:58PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 26 May 2013 18:51, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
This series breaks compilation on MacOSX:
CC
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:26:14PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 26/05/2013 20:10, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 07:00:58PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 26 May 2013 18:51, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Peter
Il 26/05/2013 20:37, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
I don't like defining __-prefixed types. Can we preprocess
linux-headers to avoid usage of __u8/16/32/64, and to
s,linux/types.h,stdint.h, ?
Paolo
Let's not be purists, and do the practical thing.
When I suggested this you didn't
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:53:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 26/05/2013 20:37, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
I don't like defining __-prefixed types. Can we preprocess
linux-headers to avoid usage of __u8/16/32/64, and to
s,linux/types.h,stdint.h, ?
Paolo
Let's not be
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually asm-generic/).
Not really, __uX appear in the headers that were posted.
What I'm saying is - a chance of a conflict is very remote,
if it happens it's a build failure so easy to
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually asm-generic/).
Not really, __uX appear in the headers that were posted.
Which is a problem because this is a reserved namespace in C99.
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:49:53PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually asm-generic/).
Not really, __uX appear in the headers that were
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:49:53PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually
asm-generic/).
Not
25 matches
Mail list logo
