On 19.08.19 21:34, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/19/19 1:55 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> The qcow2 specification says to ignore unknown extra data fields in
>> snapshot table entries. Currently, we discard it whenever we update the
>> image, which is a bit different from "ignore".
>>
>> This patch makes the
On 19.08.19 21:23, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/19/19 1:55 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> The qcow2 specification says to ignore unknown extra data fields in
>> snapshot table entries. Currently, we discard it whenever we update the
>> image, which is a bit different from "ignore".
>>
>> This patch makes the
On 8/19/19 1:55 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> The qcow2 specification says to ignore unknown extra data fields in
> snapshot table entries. Currently, we discard it whenever we update the
> image, which is a bit different from "ignore".
>
> This patch makes the qcow2 driver keep all unknown extra data f
On 8/19/19 1:55 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> The qcow2 specification says to ignore unknown extra data fields in
> snapshot table entries. Currently, we discard it whenever we update the
> image, which is a bit different from "ignore".
>
> This patch makes the qcow2 driver keep all unknown extra data f
The qcow2 specification says to ignore unknown extra data fields in
snapshot table entries. Currently, we discard it whenever we update the
image, which is a bit different from "ignore".
This patch makes the qcow2 driver keep all unknown extra data fields
when updating an image's snapshot table.
