Am 22.06.2016 um 00:26 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 06/21/2016 08:16 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 14.06.2016 um 23:30 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> >> It makes more sense to have ALL block size limit constraints
> >> in the same struct. Improve the documentation while at it.
> >>
> >> Signed-o
On 06/21/2016 08:16 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.06.2016 um 23:30 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> It makes more sense to have ALL block size limit constraints
>> in the same struct. Improve the documentation while at it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
>>
>> ---
>> struct BlockLimits {
>> +
Am 14.06.2016 um 23:30 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> It makes more sense to have ALL block size limit constraints
> in the same struct. Improve the documentation while at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
>
> ---
> v2: drop hacks for save/restore of alignment, now that earlier
> patches handled
On Tue, 06/14 15:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> It makes more sense to have ALL block size limit constraints
> in the same struct. Improve the documentation while at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng
It makes more sense to have ALL block size limit constraints
in the same struct. Improve the documentation while at it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
v2: drop hacks for save/restore of alignment, now that earlier
patches handled setting up BlockLimits more sanely
---
include/block/block_int.h
