On 04/05/2017 06:54 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 05/04/2017 11:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:38:37AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> OK, there is nothing special about g_assert_cmpint, but Coccinelle expects
>>> expressions or types in function argument lists,
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:21:13AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:41:08PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > > On 01/19/2017 08:38 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:41:08PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 01/19/2017 08:38 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > On 01/19/2017 03:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > >> Eric Blake writes:
> > >>
> > >>> Quite a few users of
On 05/04/2017 11:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:38:37AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> OK, there is nothing special about g_assert_cmpint, but Coccinelle expects
>> expressions or types in function argument lists, so it gives a parse error
>> on finding an ==.
>
> I
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:38:37AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> OK, there is nothing special about g_assert_cmpint, but Coccinelle expects
> expressions or types in function argument lists, so it gives a parse error
> on finding an ==.
I should have checked the coccinelle mailing list before
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:21:13AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:41:08PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > On 01/19/2017 08:38 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > > On 01/19/2017 03:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > >>
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:41:08PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/19/2017 08:38 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 01/19/2017 03:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Eric Blake writes:
> >>
> >>> Quite a few users of qdict_put() were manually wrapping a
> >>> non-QObject. We can
On 01/19/2017 08:38 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/19/2017 03:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> Quite a few users of qdict_put() were manually wrapping a
>>> non-QObject. We can make such call-sites shorter, by providing
>>> common macros to do the
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:16:49AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Quite a few users of qdict_put() were manually wrapping a
> non-QObject. We can make such call-sites shorter, by providing
> common macros to do the tedious work. Also shorten nearby
> qdict_put_obj(,,QOBJECT()) sequences.
>
>
On 01/19/2017 03:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> Quite a few users of qdict_put() were manually wrapping a
>> non-QObject. We can make such call-sites shorter, by providing
>> common macros to do the tedious work. Also shorten nearby
>>
Eric Blake writes:
> Quite a few users of qdict_put() were manually wrapping a
> non-QObject. We can make such call-sites shorter, by providing
> common macros to do the tedious work. Also shorten nearby
> qdict_put_obj(,,QOBJECT()) sequences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
Hi
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:44 PM Eric Blake wrote:
> Quite a few users of qdict_put() were manually wrapping a
> non-QObject. We can make such call-sites shorter, by providing
> common macros to do the tedious work. Also shorten nearby
> qdict_put_obj(,,QOBJECT())
Quite a few users of qdict_put() were manually wrapping a
non-QObject. We can make such call-sites shorter, by providing
common macros to do the tedious work. Also shorten nearby
qdict_put_obj(,,QOBJECT()) sequences.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia
13 matches
Mail list logo