On 2014-11-18 at 21:26, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/17/2014 05:06 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Umm, that sounds backwards from what you document. It's a good test of
the _new_ reftable needing a second round of allocations. So keep it
with corrected comments. But I think you _intended_ to write a test
On 2014-11-19 at 06:52, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/18/2014 01:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Now, in response to your question about some other 3-pass inducing
pattern, let's think back to v1, where you questioned what would happen
if a hole in the reftable gets turned into data due to a later
On 11/20/2014 07:03 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Some people may ask why the walks are performed in a loop without a
fixed limit (because they can't find cases where allocations haven't
settled at the third pass). But I doubt that'll be a serious problem.
It's much easier to have such a basically
On 11/20/2014 06:48 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Sounds good, the only problem is that I'd have to hand-craft the image
myself, because qemu generally uses self-references for refblocks (when
allocating new refblocks, they will contain their own refcount).
I think this already would be too much
On 11/17/2014 05:06 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Umm, that sounds backwards from what you document. It's a good test of
the _new_ reftable needing a second round of allocations. So keep it
with corrected comments. But I think you _intended_ to write a test
that starts with a refcount_width=64
On 11/18/2014 01:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Now, in response to your question about some other 3-pass inducing
pattern, let's think back to v1, where you questioned what would happen
if a hole in the reftable gets turned into data due to a later
allocation. Let's see if I can come up with a
On 2014-11-15 at 15:50, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/14/2014 06:06 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Add a test for conversion between different refcount widths and errors
specific to certain widths (i.e. snapshots with refcount_width=1).
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz mre...@redhat.com
---
tests/qemu-iotests/112
On 2014-11-17 at 09:34, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2014-11-15 at 15:50, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/14/2014 06:06 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Add a test for conversion between different refcount widths and errors
specific to certain widths (i.e. snapshots with refcount_width=1).
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
On 2014-11-17 at 11:38, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2014-11-17 at 09:34, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2014-11-15 at 15:50, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/14/2014 06:06 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Add a test for conversion between different refcount widths and errors
specific to certain widths (i.e. snapshots with
On 2014-11-15 at 15:50, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/14/2014 06:06 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Add a test for conversion between different refcount widths and errors
specific to certain widths (i.e. snapshots with refcount_width=1).
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz mre...@redhat.com
---
tests/qemu-iotests/112
On 11/14/2014 06:06 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Add a test for conversion between different refcount widths and errors
specific to certain widths (i.e. snapshots with refcount_width=1).
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz mre...@redhat.com
---
tests/qemu-iotests/112 | 252
Add a test for conversion between different refcount widths and errors
specific to certain widths (i.e. snapshots with refcount_width=1).
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz mre...@redhat.com
---
tests/qemu-iotests/112 | 252 +
tests/qemu-iotests/112.out |
12 matches
Mail list logo
