On 04.07.19 15:09, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
> It provides better compression performance maintaining
> the same level of compression ratio in comparison with
> zlib, which, by the moment, has been the only compression
> method available.
>
>
On 7/4/19 8:09 AM, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
> It provides better compression performance maintaining
> the same level of compression ratio in comparison with
> zlib, which, by the moment, has been the only compression
s/by/at/
> method
On Jul 9 2019, at 9:18 am, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Denis Plotnikov writes:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of compression ratio in comparison with
zlib, which, by the moment, has been the only
Denis Plotnikov writes:
> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
> It provides better compression performance maintaining
> the same level of compression ratio in comparison with
> zlib, which, by the moment, has been the only compression
> method available.
>
> The performance
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of compression ratio in comparison with
zlib, which, by the moment, has been the only compression
method available.
The performance test results:
Test compresses and
