On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:47:20 -0300
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
>> Hi Igor,
>>
>> awesome clean refactor!
> Thanks,
>
> there is more patches on this topic for other targets to post
> but it's
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> there are 2 use cases to deal with:
> 1: fixed CPU models per board/soc
> 2: boards with user configurable cpu_model and fallback to
> default cpu_model if user hasn't specified one explicitly
>
> For the 1st
>
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:47:20 -0300
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> awesome clean refactor!
Thanks,
there is more patches on this topic for other targets to post
but it's waiting on 1-3/5 to land in master so it would be
easier for maintainers to verify/test them
Hi Igor,
awesome clean refactor!
just 1 comment inlined.
On 09/13/2017 01:04 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
there are 2 use cases to deal with:
1: fixed CPU models per board/soc
2: boards with user configurable cpu_model and fallback to
default cpu_model if user hasn't specified one
there are 2 use cases to deal with:
1: fixed CPU models per board/soc
2: boards with user configurable cpu_model and fallback to
default cpu_model if user hasn't specified one explicitly
For the 1st
drop intermediate cpu_model parsing and use const cpu type
directly, which replaces: