On 17/09/2018 04:54, David Gibson wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I think we have all the necessary acks to go ahead with this.
> However, I'm afraid I've lost track of the various prereq patches that
> were necessary here. Can you resend with all the necessary pieces
> rebased against ppc-for-3.1 and the
On 17/09/18 04:54, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:46:29PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> According to the PReP specification section 6.1.6 "System Interrupt
>> Assignments", all PCI interrupts are routed via IRQ 15.
>>
>> In the case of the 40p machine this isn't quite true
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:46:29PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> According to the PReP specification section 6.1.6 "System Interrupt
> Assignments", all PCI interrupts are routed via IRQ 15.
>
> In the case of the 40p machine this isn't quite true in that it has a routing
> quirk: the LSI SCSI
Le 10/09/2018 à 22:46, Mark Cave-Ayland a écrit :
According to the PReP specification section 6.1.6 "System Interrupt
Assignments", all PCI interrupts are routed via IRQ 15.
In the case of the 40p machine this isn't quite true in that it has a routing
quirk: the LSI SCSI device is always routed
According to the PReP specification section 6.1.6 "System Interrupt
Assignments", all PCI interrupts are routed via IRQ 15.
In the case of the 40p machine this isn't quite true in that it has a routing
quirk: the LSI SCSI device is always routed to IRQ 13. At least Linux and
NetBSD compare the
