On 26/09/2016 11:02, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Huh, this has beacame more hairy than I initially thought. An
> alternative suggestion might be to not call PID->name translate function
> from the signal handler, but call it just from the qemu_kill_report().
> Yes, this will increase the chances
On 22.09.2016 18:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 21/09/2016 18:27, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> This is v2 of:
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-09/msg05058.html
>>
>> Diff to v2:
>> - In 1/2 I've dropped stdio funcs in favour of g_file_get_contents() (thanks
>> Dan!)
>>
On 21/09/2016 18:27, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> This is v2 of:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-09/msg05058.html
>
> Diff to v2:
> - In 1/2 I've dropped stdio funcs in favour of g_file_get_contents() (thanks
> Dan!)
>
> Michal Privoznik (2):
> util: Introduce
Hi,
Your series failed automatic build test. Please find the testing commands and
their output below. If you have docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
Type: series
Message-id: cover.1474475100.git.mpriv...@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] Produce better
Hi,
Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: cover.1474475100.git.mpriv...@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] Produce better termination message
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n=1
total
This is v2 of:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-09/msg05058.html
Diff to v2:
- In 1/2 I've dropped stdio funcs in favour of g_file_get_contents() (thanks
Dan!)
Michal Privoznik (2):
util: Introduce qemu_get_pid_name
qemu_kill_report: Report PID name too
