On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:10:01AM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
>> Do you think this series is ready to be merged?
>> I have some code to run hpet on a dedicated thread, and in theory it
>> will rely on this.
>
> Yes, it is ready. To ease th
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:10:01AM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
> Do you think this series is ready to be merged?
> I have some code to run hpet on a dedicated thread, and in theory it
> will rely on this.
Yes, it is ready. To ease the merge I have rebased it and sent a new
revision.
Stefan
Hi Stefan,
Do you think this series is ready to be merged?
I have some code to run hpet on a dedicated thread, and in theory it
will rely on this.
Thanks and regards,
Pingfan
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> v3:
> * Squashed Paolo's fixes and added his patch to avoid
v3:
* Squashed Paolo's fixes and added his patch to avoid locking in
timer_pending()
v2:
* Rebased onto qemu.git/master following the merge of Alex's AioContext timers
The purpose of these patches is to eventually allow device models to set and
cancel timers without holding the global mutex.
