On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:56:25 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> We want to provide more hw features to guests, namely the new bpb
> control as well as other transparent facilities that might be
> introduced by firmware updates (e.g. the stfle facility 81).
>
> See the
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:31:50 +0100
Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:47:54 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >> Have the x86
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:47:54 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> Have the x86 features been marked as stable? If the answer is yes,
>> shall we mark these patches for stable as well?
>
>
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:47:54 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Have the x86 features been marked as stable? If the answer is yes,
> shall we mark these patches for stable as well?
Doesn't look like it.
TBH, I'm not quite sure whether this should go into stable as I'm
On 01/18/2018 12:53 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:56:25 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> We want to provide more hw features to guests, namely the new bpb
>> control as well as other transparent facilities that might be
>> introduced by
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:56:25 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> We want to provide more hw features to guests, namely the new bpb
> control as well as other transparent facilities that might be
> introduced by firmware updates (e.g. the stfle facility 81).
>
> See the
We want to provide more hw features to guests, namely the new bpb
control as well as other transparent facilities that might be
introduced by firmware updates (e.g. the stfle facility 81).
See the kernel discussion for the KVM side
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2700551.html
v2->v3: -