Hi Suzuki,
On 07/02/2018 03:24 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>
> On 02/07/18 13:14, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Suzuki,
>>
>> On 06/29/2018 01:15 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> So far we had a static stage2 page table handling code, based on a
>>> fixed IPA of 40bits. As we prepare for
Hi Eric,
On 02/07/18 13:14, Auger Eric wrote:
Hi Suzuki,
On 06/29/2018 01:15 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
So far we had a static stage2 page table handling code, based on a
fixed IPA of 40bits. As we prepare for a configurable IPA size per
VM, make our stage2 page table code dynamic, to do
Hi Suzuki,
On 06/29/2018 01:15 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> So far we had a static stage2 page table handling code, based on a
> fixed IPA of 40bits. As we prepare for a configurable IPA size per
> VM, make our stage2 page table code dynamic, to do the right thing
> for a given VM. We ensure the
On 29/06/18 12:15, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
So far we had a static stage2 page table handling code, based on a
fixed IPA of 40bits. As we prepare for a configurable IPA size per
VM, make our stage2 page table code dynamic, to do the right thing
for a given VM. We ensure the existing condition is
So far we had a static stage2 page table handling code, based on a
fixed IPA of 40bits. As we prepare for a configurable IPA size per
VM, make our stage2 page table code dynamic, to do the right thing
for a given VM. We ensure the existing condition is always true even
when we lift the limit on
