On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:38:01PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2016-10-03 13:03-0300, Eduardo Habkost:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:10:06PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
[...]
> >> +static void x86_cpu_apic_create(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> >> +{
> >> +APICCommonState *apic;
> >> +ObjectC
2016-10-03 13:03-0300, Eduardo Habkost:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:10:06PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> Every configuration has only up to one APIC class and we'll be extending
>> the class with a function that can be called without an instanced
>> object, so a direct access to the class is conv
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:03:33 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:10:06PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > Every configuration has only up to one APIC class and we'll be extending
> > the class with a function that can be called without an instanced
> > object, so a direct acces
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:10:06PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> Every configuration has only up to one APIC class and we'll be extending
> the class with a function that can be called without an instanced
> object, so a direct access to the class is convenient.
>
> This patch will break compilatio
Every configuration has only up to one APIC class and we'll be extending
the class with a function that can be called without an instanced
object, so a direct access to the class is convenient.
This patch will break compilation if some code uses apic_get_class()
with CONFIG_USER_ONLY.
Suggested-b
