11.01.2019 22:47, Eric Blake wrote:
> Since we already forbid other nbd-server commands when not
> in the right state, it is unlikely that any caller was relying
> on a second stop to behave as a silent no-op. Update iotest
> 223 to show the improved behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
Since we already forbid other nbd-server commands when not
in the right state, it is unlikely that any caller was relying
on a second stop to behave as a silent no-op. Update iotest
223 to show the improved behavior.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
v3: new patch
---
blockdev-nbd.c |
