Richard Henderson writes:
> On 01/12/2017 08:03 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> And I immediately realise I missed out:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
>>> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
>> [DG: ppc portions]
>> Acked-by: David Gibson
>>
>> Do you want me to re-post or can you apply when you take
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:47:31PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> We have never has the concept of global TLB entries which would avoid
> the flush so we never actually use this flag. Drop it and make clear
> that tlb_flush is the sledge-hammer it has always been.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
> Re
On 01/12/2017 08:03 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> And I immediately realise I missed out:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
>> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
> [DG: ppc portions]
> Acked-by: David Gibson
>
> Do you want me to re-post or can you apply when you take the patches?
>
I also don't mind i
Alex Bennée writes:
> We have never has the concept of global TLB entries which would avoid
> the flush so we never actually use this flag. Drop it and make clear
> that tlb_flush is the sledge-hammer it has always been.
>
And I immediately realise I missed out:
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
>
We have never has the concept of global TLB entries which would avoid
the flush so we never actually use this flag. Drop it and make clear
that tlb_flush is the sledge-hammer it has always been.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
---
cputlb.c | 2
