On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:19:28 -0300
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:01:04AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:50:35 -0200
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
Instead of silently assigning CPU to node 0 when it is omitted from
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:50:35 -0200
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
Instead of silently assigning CPU to node 0 when it is omitted from the
command-line, check if all CPUs up to max_cpus are present in the NUMA
configuration.
That would also trigger warning for possible (i.e. to be
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:01:04AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:50:35 -0200
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
Instead of silently assigning CPU to node 0 when it is omitted from the
command-line, check if all CPUs up to max_cpus are present in the NUMA
Instead of silently assigning CPU to node 0 when it is omitted from the
command-line, check if all CPUs up to max_cpus are present in the NUMA
configuration.
I am making this a warning and not a fatal error, to allow management
software to be updated if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost
On 12/02/2015 18:50, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
+
+if (!bitmap_full(seen_cpus, max_cpus)) {
+char *msg;
+bitmap_complement(seen_cpus, seen_cpus, max_cpus);
+msg = enumerate_cpus(seen_cpus, max_cpus);
+error_report(warning: CPU(s) not present in any NUMA
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 07:22:37PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 12/02/2015 18:50, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
+
+if (!bitmap_full(seen_cpus, max_cpus)) {
+char *msg;
+bitmap_complement(seen_cpus, seen_cpus, max_cpus);
+msg = enumerate_cpus(seen_cpus, max_cpus);
