On 7/26/19 8:03 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote:
> On 7/25/19 9:45 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>On 7/25/19 11:52 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote:
>>> Replacing size with size+sign+endianness (MemOp) will enable us to
>>> collapse the two byte swaps, adjust_endianness and handle_bswap, along
>>>
On 7/25/19 9:45 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>On 7/25/19 11:52 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote:
>> Replacing size with size+sign+endianness (MemOp) will enable us to
>> collapse the two byte swaps, adjust_endianness and handle_bswap, along
>> the I/O path.
>>
>> While interfaces are converted,
On 7/25/19 11:52 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote:
> Replacing size with size+sign+endianness (MemOp) will enable us to
> collapse the two byte swaps, adjust_endianness and handle_bswap, along
> the I/O path.
>
> While interfaces are converted, callers will have existing unsigned
> size coerced into
Replacing size with size+sign+endianness (MemOp) will enable us to
collapse the two byte swaps, adjust_endianness and handle_bswap, along
the I/O path.
While interfaces are converted, callers will have existing unsigned
size coerced into a MemOp, and the callee will use this MemOp as an
unsigned
Replacing size with size+sign+endianness (MemOp) will enable us to
collapse the two byte swaps, adjust_endianness and handle_bswap, along
the I/O path.
While interfaces are converted, callers will have existing unsigned
size coerced into a MemOp, and the callee will use this MemOp as an
unsigned
